Written by Julien Ricciarelli-Bonnal

14 December 2025

ChatGPT 5.2 vs Google Gemini 3: the new frontier of artificial intelligence

For several years, generative artificial intelligence has become not only a vector of productivity, but a strategic battlefield where two giants — OpenAI and Google DeepMind — compete with technologies that shape the future of business, research, innovation, and even our relationship to work. In December 2025, this confrontation entered a new phase with the release of GPT-5.2 by OpenAI and the rise of Google Gemini 3, two models that embody very different philosophies, technological heritages, and priorities. The issue is no longer simply to produce coherent answers, but to understand how these models integrate into real-world use cases for organizations, creators, and professionals.

A context of escalating competition

The release of GPT-5.2 came in a particular context: OpenAI reportedly activated a true internal “code red” to accelerate development in response to the competitive pressure created by Google and its Gemini 3 model.

Gemini 3, presented as Google’s most advanced AI model to date, is attracting attention precisely because it combines textual, visual, and multimodal capabilities into a single engine, making it especially powerful for integrated tasks.

Behind this technological race lie several layers: usage dominance (how many people use which model), multimodal capabilities (text, image, audio, video), reasoning performance, and the way each model adapts to complex tasks, workflows, and enterprise environments.

ChatGPT 5.2: improving general intelligence

With GPT-5.2, OpenAI did not aim to dramatically reinvent the user experience; the goal was to deepen intelligence, precision, and reliability while staying usable for professional contexts.

This new model — available in variants such as Instant, Thinking, and Pro — was designed to better handle long contexts, reduce hallucinations, interpret complex instructions, and excel at coding, data analysis, structured document creation, and multi-step project management.

Instead of adding flashy features, GPT-5.2 focuses on general intelligence improvements, a strategic choice reflecting the needs of professionals who rely on the model for advanced tasks across languages and industries.

However, this comes with trade-offs: improved capacity also means higher operational costs, reflected in increased pricing for enterprise users and heavier compute requirements.

Google Gemini 3: native multimodal power

Google’s response is embodied in Gemini 3, the company’s most ambitious AI system yet. Where ChatGPT strengthens textual reasoning and structured task execution, Gemini 3 pushes native multimodal integration — the ability to process text, images, video, and audio without needing external modules.

This translates into remarkable performance on scientific questions, visual interpretation, and cross-modal information synthesis. Its native multimodality makes it an ideal candidate for environments where diverse data formats matter as much as the answer itself.

This is why Google continues integrating Gemini deeply across its ecosystem — Search, Workspace, Android, Chrome — in a way that positions Gemini not just as a chatbot, but as a core productivity engine.

Two different technical philosophies

At a deeper level, the rivalry between GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 reflects two divergent philosophies in AI development.

OpenAI prioritizes depth of reasoning and long-context intelligence.
GPT-5.2 is built to excel in multi-step workflows, structured explanations, strategy building, writing long documents, and addressing problems requiring internal logic.

Google prioritizes universal multimodal comprehension.
Gemini 3 absorbs text, images, audio, and video as a single flow, making it ideal for tasks involving mixed formats and real-world signals.

GPT-5.2 is the expert analyst.
Gemini 3 is the universal sensor.e IA conçue pour assister dans la construction du sens long et une IA conçue pour intégrer la complexité du monde réel de façon immédiate et multimodale.

Stop losing revenue and start getting more leads with Ricciarelli Consulting.

Strategic analysis, message refinement, digital optimisation, commercial coherence: a direct and actionable approach for SMEs, entrepreneurs & business leaders who want to grow and benefit from ongoing expert support.

➜ Discover Ricciarelli Consulting.

Beyond performance: the real question is usage

Benchmarks don’t tell the whole story. What matters is how each model fits real-world workflows.

GPT-5.2 is often more efficient for structured professional tasks:
• writing reports
• coding
• analysing data
• building complex strategic documents
• managing long contexts

Gemini 3 shines where multimodality is essential:
• interpreting visuals
• mixing text + image inputs
• educational use cases
• interactive and creative workflows

This is why preferences differ across industries: analysts, consultants, and strategists may prefer GPT-5.2, while designers, educators, and multimedia professionals may naturally migrate toward Gemini 3.

Not a battle for domination — a coexistence

It is tempting to frame the GPT-5.2 vs Gemini battle as a fight for supremacy. In truth, the landscape is far more nuanced.

GPT-5.2 brings unmatched depth for reasoning and structured tasks.
Gemini 3 brings unmatched fluidity for multimodal, real-world inputs.

The decision for organizations will depend not on which model is “better”, but on which model aligns with their actual context of use.

Increasingly, the future of AI is not about choosing a champion, but about orchestrating the right model for the right task.